Section 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 6060at Qatil Ahmed Definition was defined as a breach of the rules of law of the administration justice trial, resulting in negligence and ridicule of justice. There was action. Such an action would not only damage the public's confidence but also harm the great profession of law in the eyes of the community, the statement of the prosecution witness recorded in violation of Section 606060, CRPC, The purpose was to get an accurate record from the witness he really had to say. And before giving a statement to the court or his clerk to give him an opportunity to correct the words, his witness should read the evidence so that he could find any error in the words that were taken from his lips. Save from The accused were charged with serious prejudice, which resulted in the abortion of the Presiding Officer of Justice to record the evidence in his hand. And if that was not possible for him, he should have been removed from the presiding judge's direct dictation by the clerk / reader, in the present case there was little evidence on record to link the accused to the commission. Witnesses of the alleged crime did not utter a word against one of the accused till the appeal to the extent that the accused was allowed and he was acquitted of the charge and ordered to be released immediately. The said decision was set aside and a remand for the trial was obtained. Court for other accused's trial
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
