Arts 9, 14, 19, 187 and 184 (3) were read with the rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, and XXXII, R1 and 2 and XXXVI Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), to seek the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The constitutional petitions of the petition, questions contained in the contents of a paper published in a newspaper / Financial Times / London, on the allegations made by the respondents and on the question of public importance were written in the constitution. The basic rights were created in accordance with Defendant's version, by former Section National Security Advisor Maintainability to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U. Drafted / drafted for the purpose of delivering, the applicants were able to prove that the matters involved were fair and there was a question of public importance in relation to implementation. The first right, under Articles 9, 14 and 19A of the Constitution, was, thus, granted to the petitioners under Article 184 (3) of the CK. Were able to maintain this initiative so that steps could be taken to ensure the implementation of these fundamental rights, through which the memo to deliver to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U Section was created, drafted / drafted. , Demanded for accuracy and detection. Former U. section national security adviser, thus, in exercise of the powers conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 187 of the Constitution, Order XXII, Rules 1 and 2, with the principles of the Civil Procedure Code, Order XXXVI of the Supreme Court Rules 1980 Read with. , A commission was appointed, as the law had the right of all parties to the process, therefore, to ensure a transparent investigation of the matter.
