Find a Lawyer

HUMAN RIGHTS CASE NO. 24077-G OF 2011 versus

Articles 184 (3), 4 and 9 of the human rights case sought by the former federal minister seeking protection of his rights under Articles 4 and 9 of the Constitution were answered by a provincial minister in a conversation with the media. The refusal and denial of such allegations in such a plea was already on the floor of the Provincial Assembly, and the acceptance of their explanation by the opposition leader's respondent's counsel stated before the Supreme Court that the defendants Or there is no danger to the applicant's life on behalf of the provincial government. And this applicant shall have full protection as per the provisions of the Constitution. The applicant did not file any response to the respondents. The Supreme Court dealt with such an observation that if the applicant feels inconvenienced, he can approach the relevant authority. n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MUHAMMAD AFSAR v. Malik MUHAMMAD FAROOQ 2012 SCMR 274
• STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor v. IMTIAZ ALI KHAN 2012 SCMR 280
• WATAN PARTY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 PLD 292
• PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Sindh Secretariat v. PROSECUTOR-GENERAL SINDH, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT 2012 SCMR 307
• KHALID @ KHALIDI v. State 2012 SCMR 327
• ALI KHAN KAKAR v. HAMMAD ABBASI 2012 SCMR 334
• APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. SONERI BANK LTD. 2012 CLD 337
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2012 SCMR 345

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Mehar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes