Section 2302 (b) Qatil Ahmed reacted to the evidence then the death sentence awarded by the trial court by the trial court by the two FIR courts resulted in immediate FIR 15 Submitted within year. Where the accused was specifically designated with a specific character attached to him and charged with molestation, with the possibility of being lied to in this case dismissed, otherwise it would be common sense. What was even worse was that the complainant would release the original culprit and add someone else. All the material details of the prosecution's case were sustained during the trial as long as the defendant's character was concerned, the prosecution's testimony was confirmed by medical evidence, which was about the weapon, the location of the ocular. Was according to the account. Injury and time spent between injury and post-mortem examination were correlated. The recent review of the evidence provided by the two courts below resulted in the detection of the crime was not contradictory, counterfeit, or against the evidence headed by the prosecution, High court refuses to intervene in sentence and appeal dismissed by High Court
