Section 302 (b) / 449/460/34 law martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) re-doubted the evidence of Qatil Adh and the domestic plea and sentenced him to death on two imprisonments but the High Court upheld the sentence. Was converted to life imprisonment. The incident took place at 2am in the morning at 20am, the FIR was recorded on 4/5 in the morning, the doctor performed the medical examination of the injured at 4am but performed a post-mortem examination. About ten hours later, at three o'clock in the afternoon, such facts show that an FIR was not filed at the appointed time; the prosecutor did not present the injured witness to the prosecutor, which argued against the prosecutor. Maybe if she was presented, she wouldn't have it. The supported prosecution version of the Ocular Account was not of a role that could be relied upon to convict a person in capital accusation when it was not endorsed by any other independent evidence. The presence of both witnesses was not established at the time of the incident and the incident, because their statements were denied by the appellate court, the evidence was not one that could be relied upon to convict a person on capital charges. Because there was an eyewitness account. It is full of contradictions and doubts and it is up to the accused to take advantage of such contradictions and doubts. The Supreme Court set aside the punishment and punishment given to the accused persons and they were acquitted of the charges. Appeal allowed
