PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH, SINDH SECRETARIAT versus PROSECUTOR-GENERAL SINDH, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT
Sections 5 (2) (3) and 6 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Transfer and Posting The prosecutor general, the jurisdiction of the respondents, was the Sindh Criminal Prosecution Service, who issued their exchange and the prosecutor's office. Invited a posting order. The General High Court upheld the posting orders, rejecting the petition filed by the defendants. The transfer and posting power was deliberately placed with the Prosecutor General, who otherwise served under the Sindh Criminal Prosecution Service (Customs, Duties and Powers) Act, 2009. , Since they were given a better place to make informed decisions about the transfer of service members against the Special Secretary, Law and Justice Department Legislators, for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act, The authority was delegated, under the supervision of the administration and the Prosecutor General, to make them the head of the service with the sole purpose of fully influencing the administration. Such powers of service must include the transfer of service members and Posting option is included because they know their experience, skills and professionalism Accordingly, the posting of members was the best judge under which transfer and posting powers were given. The law governing legislative intent using the control and head of service of the administration of administration under Sections 5 (2), 5 (3) and 6 (1) of the Prosecutor General Sindh Criminal Prosecution Service (Constitution, Duties and Powers) Act, 2009 Had to make. This means the prosecutor responsible for controlling the administration and services and controlling the words
