PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH, SINDH SECRETARIAT versus PROSECUTOR-GENERAL SINDH, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT
Sections 5 (2) (3) and 6 (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Transfer and Posting The prosecutor general, the jurisdiction of the respondents, was the Sindh Criminal Prosecution Service, who issued their exchange and the prosecutor's office. Invited a posting order. The General High Court upheld the posting orders, rejecting the petition filed by the defendants. The transfer and posting power was deliberately placed with the Prosecutor General, who otherwise served under the Sindh Criminal Prosecution Service (Customs, Duties and Powers) Act, 2009. Because they were better positioned to make informed decisions about the transfer of service members, the Special Secretary, the Law and Justice Department, controlled the legislature to achieve its objectives for freedom of service. Was given the option of Supervising the administration and the prosecutor general, with the sole purpose of influencing their administration, entrusts such authority with the sole purpose of transferring and posting members of the service, as such He was the best judge to post to members according to his experience, skills and professional knowledge, under which transfer and posting options were given. The Prosecutor General was intended to legislate using the control and head-off service of the administration expressed under Sections 5 (2), 5 (3) and 6 (1) of the Sindh Prosecution Service (Constitution, Duties and Powers) Act, 2009. The prosecutor responsible for controlling the administration and the services and controlling the words would mean that he had the Sindh criminal
