HYDER ALI BHIMJI versus VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI (SOUTH)
Section 15 (2) (iii) (a) Excluding a new tenant application, Landlord was tried to evict the tenant on the basis that he established two independent businesses and leased the rental premises to these businesses. , Terminated the rental controller without their permission. The request for dismissal but the lower appellate court and the High Court formally approved the eviction order against the tenant. The tenant did not declare in front of the controller a lien or termination against the tenant that the company or firm was licensed to him and therefore included in the damaged premises to conduct the business of the tenant or their own tenant. was done. The lower appellate court failed to raise such a request, neither did it in the constitutional petition nor before the High Court on the basis of a case of tenant's company / firm license status with the tenants. Was presented before the forum or before the courts. The tenant cannot, for the first time, be considered by the Supreme Court, especially when there is no evidence on record. Such a request was made by the tenant without the written consent of the landlord, the legal and physical possession of the premises. And other parts of it were given to the shareholders under which the courts refused to interfere with the order of eviction. Two courts were excluded from the appeal
