The removal of Section 2 (XXX) and 46 Service Production Supervisor Post Complaint Petition Petitioner requested that they be removed from the job without notice or inquiry, therefore, the applicant was a 'laborer'. ' was not. , The Labor Court had no jurisdiction to hear the petition. The accuracy record shows that the applicant was not granted the right to defend himself. The employer did not say from the applicant's statement that he performed his duties manually, not the position, but the nature of the responsibility. Will determine. Whether an individual was a laborer or an applicant was a labor court, the Labor Court had jurisdiction to decide whether the impeachment order did not meet the legal requirements due to reason. That the under-applicants still hold their positions. , The employer's position that the applicant's position was terminated, an angry complaint request was accepted in the circumstances \ r \ n
