Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR

RR 4 (1) (b), 5 and 6 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) on the basis of the goods collected, the necessary retirement from the mismanagement. There was no formal inquiry into the matter by the Service Tribunal Validity Department in connection with the inquiry of the department and regular inquiry against the appellant against the appellant, but the appellant had, in fact, inquired. The opportunity to investigate was not given. The appellant suffered prejudice due to the abortion of justice.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. State 2012 SCMR 707
• LAHORE POLYPROPYLENE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 709
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. BILQIAZ KHAN 2012 SCMR 721
• SHEERIN ZAFAR v. ZAHID REHMAN 2012 SCMR 728
• ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT through EACO Bhakkar v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2012 SCMR 730
• Syed JAVED IQBAL BOKHARI v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad 2012 SCMR 736
• MUHAMMAD ADIL LATIF v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT 2012 PLC(CS) 740
• QAISAR v. MUHAMMAD SHAFAQAT SHARIF 2012 SCMR 743

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates from Lalshanra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes