Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus STATE

Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 murder Um Bell, the plea grant of the Alibi accused, was suppressed in the request of Alibi's service and it was claimed that he was a transport company employee and was at S and Was not at home At the time of the incident, the accuracy High Court had rightly observed that this was a case, the truth of which would be decided at trial, the Supreme Court refused to grant the bail.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• QAMAR SULTAN v. Mst. BIBI SUFAIDAN 2012 SCMR 695
• MAHMOOD KHALID v. SENIOR MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2012 CLD 698
• CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB v. Malik ASIF HAYAT 2012 PLC(CS) 701
• TARIQ MEHMOOD A. KHAN v. SINDH BAR COUNCIL 2012 SCMR 702
• LAHORE POLYPROPYLENE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 709
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. BILQIAZ KHAN 2012 SCMR 721
• SHEERIN ZAFAR v. ZAHID REHMAN 2012 SCMR 728
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2012 PLC(CS) 728

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

ask a advocate free from Makran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes