The removal of Article 2 (XXX) and 46 Service Production Supervisor Post Complaint Petition Petitioner requested that they be removed from the job without notice or inquiry, therefore no applicant There was no 'labor'. , The Labor Court had no jurisdiction to hear the petition. The accuracy record shows that the applicant was not granted the right to defend himself. The employer did not say from the applicant's statement that he performed his duties manually, not the position, but the nature of the responsibility. Will determine. Whether an individual was a laborer or not an applicant, the Labor Court had jurisdiction to decide whether the impugned order did not meet the legal requirements for reasons not known. Persons younger than still hold their positions, that is, the position that the applicant's position was terminated, he was rejected.
