Find a Lawyer

ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH EACO BHAKKAR versus ALI MUHAMMAD

Sections 10 and 36 declare the restoration of state land through the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 161 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 9 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Colony Officer. The plaintiff did not take advantage of the appeal under section 161 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, for the failure to satisfy the prerequisites required by the plaintiff's jurisdiction for the case. Thus, the jurisdiction of the civil court Was given jurisdiction to resolve such issues. The dispute is exclusively with the revenue courts

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• LAHORE POLYPROPYLENE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 709
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. BILQIAZ KHAN 2012 SCMR 721
• SHEERIN ZAFAR v. ZAHID REHMAN 2012 SCMR 728
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2012 PLC(CS) 728
• Syed JAVED IQBAL BOKHARI v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad 2012 SCMR 736
• MUHAMMAD ADIL LATIF v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT 2012 PLC(CS) 740
• QAISAR v. MUHAMMAD SHAFAQAT SHARIF 2012 SCMR 743
• I.-G. PUNJAB, LAHORE v. IQBAL MEHMOOD 2012 SCMR 745

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

pakistani advocates Murree lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes