Find a Lawyer

SHEERIN ZAFAR versus ZAHID REHMAN

Article 2?2 (b), 6 306 (b) and 8 308 Constitution of Pakistan, Article ?d 185 ()) Not responsible for Qatl-Um-Qasas; Appeal of Supreme Court's contentious decisions allowed by the Supreme Court to be considered factually and legally. Approved for. Aspects of the present case were highlighted by the accused and a verdict was decided by a large bench of the Supreme Court to resolve the legal dispute in a relaxed manner, which was expressed by various Benches of the Supreme Court. Was caused by deviation of opinion.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• TARIQ MEHMOOD A. KHAN v. SINDH BAR COUNCIL 2012 SCMR 702
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. State 2012 SCMR 707
• LAHORE POLYPROPYLENE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 709
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. BILQIAZ KHAN 2012 SCMR 721
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. REGIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2012 PLC(CS) 728
• ADMINISTRATOR, THAL DEVELOPMENT through EACO Bhakkar v. ALI MUHAMMAD 2012 SCMR 730
• Syed JAVED IQBAL BOKHARI v. THE STATE through Prosecutor-General, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad 2012 SCMR 736
• MUHAMMAD ADIL LATIF v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT 2012 PLC(CS) 740

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

family advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes