CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF versus DIWAN SHEIKH TAJ-UD-DIN
Notification No. SOB II 3 (4) / Period / 60, Article 8 6 of 1992, Article 185 (3) of the 1992 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) for the maintenance of the shrine to the decoration of the shrine According to the court (Hazrat Baba Farid-ud-din Ganj Shukar), the apex department sought to take possession of the aforesaid property which was declared a legal property. Attempts were made which stated that without legitimate authority on this basis, notification would be said that in this case the property is neither dedicated nor departmental. Is associated with It was that the alleged owners (the respondents / descendants of the late Sajjad Nasheen who were rewarded with the land) had no title to the property and were in possession only on the basis that their ancestors were buried by Nawab Bahawalpur. The property was granted for the purpose of maintenance. The property can be called or declared as dedicated property only if it was accepted by the person who claimed Islam for any purpose. Yes. Islam has been included in the description of section 7 of the Religious, Religious or Charitable or Punjab Dedicated Property Ordinance, 1979, under which the Nawab of Bahawalpur identified that the property was given to the ancestors of the alleged owners. The condition was that it would be considered the property of the ancestors. The Syed documents do not show that either a trust has been created or that the said property is considered part of the shrine and the purpose of the document (sanad)). It seems that the property is owned, taken care of by the shrine
