Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471 Constitution of Pakistan, Section 185 (3) of fraudulent and dishonest property as a forged document as a forged document Following the bail plea of dismissal, the pre-arrest bail of the accused (respondent) was granted by the complainant (applicant) High Court convictions that the accused (defendant) was allegedly involved. There was a lot of confusing material on the investigation records. There was no error by the complainant in the case of legal proceedings against the accused under Sections 2020 and 1 47 accused, though PPC was guaranteed while under section 68, under 68, PPC, is not guaranteed. So, the prohibition clause contained in section 497 (1) did not attract. ), The CRPC did not have evidence on record to prove that it was not the accused, who had originally falsified the relevant documents. The accused was already involved in the investigation and the police did not require further investigation into his physical custody. The reservations for grant of bail and his cancellation were quite different. There was no question of any misuse or misuse by the accused. The accused was not charged. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the jurisdictional jurisdiction and intervention of the jurisdiction in which the High Court Petition was dismissed and the leave of appeal was denied.
