MUHAMMAD SULEMAN versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ WEALTH TAX, FAISALABAD
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Failure to file an appeal within 90 days of the filing of the Department's representation before the Service Tribunal should be dismissed by the request of the Service Tribunal that after filing the representation on 139 1999, He filed a reminder on 28 4. 2001, which was dismissed under the order dated 11 6 2002, should be appealed before the Tribunal as there was no time limit. And that during that period, he approached the High Court's endorsement when the decision of the Court of Appeal was not reached within 90 days, before the Tribunal under Proviso (A) of section 4 of the Appellant Service Tribunal Act, 1973. Could have filed an appeal. The appellant had not specified that long. The limitation cannot be calculated as there was no representation for the appellant's proceedings for the first time, referring to the High Court during such period was absolutely irrelevant and would not extend to any extent, the Supreme Court said. Refused to allow appeals in circumstances. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
