Article 2/34 // 34 Constitution of Pakistan, Article ? QQ ()) Medical and ocular evidence relating to the refusal of medical evidence to appeal against a misdemeanor conviction In a statement explaining the delay in the FIR, the trial court granted the two accused 302 (b), sentenced and sentenced under PPC. The High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the two accused, if the three witnesses who presented the ocular account, if the incident was seen, nothing prevented them from filing the case on that day, instead Were waiting The presence of prosecution witnesses 3 days to record their statements became even more suspicious as none of them went to the hospital for postmortem inspection, but medical evidence confirmed the accuracy of the ocular account. That the High Court found contradictory to the ocular account prosecution. In their statements before the police, the witnesses said that the deceased was shot on his neck but during the hearing, he offered his version and said that it was below the neck. Such reasons were not speculative or disagreeable. And because it was against the weight of the evidence on record, it was inappropriate to decide the fate of the accused. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision.
