Find a Lawyer

TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI versus SAQIB SAMDANI

Section 4 Contractor Employee Service Restoration The respondent for this incident was employed on a one-year contract, after which he was terminated from service The Service Tribunal allowed defendant's appeal and restored him to employment, Thereafter, someone was on contract-based employment, so no right was created for him to be reinstated in the service so that the respondent was not appointed a regular employee against a particular quota so that he had no good reason. Could be rendered if the decision passed by the service tribunal was silent on whether the defendant's termination of employment was due to any of his Rights are also violated. , Their rehabilitation was not properly ordered under the judgment passed by the service tribunal, which allowed the Supreme Court to appeal the service tribunal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MASOOD AHMED BHATTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O. Information Technology and Telecommunication 2012 SCMR 152
• DIRECTOR-GENERAL, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU, ISLAMABAD v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2012 SCMR 165
• State v. Rana NISAR AHMAD 2012 SCMR 167
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Director-General of Intelligence and Investigation FBR, Karachi v. MUHAMMAD JAMAL RIZVI 2012 SCMR 169
• SHAHZAD TANVEER v. State 2012 SCMR 172
• Mst. KULSOOM NAZ v. Dr. ITIFAQ HUSSAIN 2012 SCMR 177
• SHER MUHAMMAD UNAR v. State 2012 PLD 179
• PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. ABDUL FATEH 2012 SCMR 181

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

online advocate from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes