Section 230b (b) / 2 39un / Q 34 Laws of Martyrdom (of 1984 of ten), Article Q 22 Qutel Amad, evidence of robbery and criminal identification parade, ) And 2, was convicted under PPC and sentenced to prison. For life and ten years, respectively, Pliya had alleged that he had been wrongly implicated in the case and had been shown to the prosecution witnesses before the identity parade, the arrest of the accused was collected through extensive investigation. The result of the dumb evidence. The next day after his arrest, he was sent to a judicial lockup and five days later, an identity parade was held in the lockup / jail premises, with nothing available to indicate where the suspects were at the police station. Witnesses were shown or their photographs captured while they were charged. The time, date and place of the alleged alienation were not specified, when they were not shown to the witnesses, nor did they make such allegations again by the magistrate who supervised the identification parade or during the trial. 342, certi ?? cated by proof of confidence in his statement under CRPC and receipt of share money from both defendants in the Akulon account, an accused also recovered 30 bore. The forensic scientist who seized the pistol from his house revealed that the pistol was found to have been recovered from the vacant lot on the spot, the accused Supreme Court refused to intervene and sentenced the accused. The appeal was dismissed
