Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL KARIM versus HAJI NOOR BADSHAH


AXIV, R1 and XX, R5 Constitution of Pakistan, Art 185 (3) Receipt of money on the basis of recovery The defendant's trial on a contentious recovery trial has been refused. Appeals and revisions to the hearing are upheld by the Court of Appeal. The respondent's objection before the High Court was that the trial court did not make any specific case about the authenticity of the disputed recovery; the defendant was well aware of the case filed against him and requested to amend the case. Without giving any proof that there was no prejudice. The defendants did not raise such an objection in the appeal and review by the non-formation of any particular issue, thus, before this, the courts of the Supreme Court could not have been allowed that before. The Supreme Court's courts dismissed the decision after considering the evidence regarding the parties' endorsement. Controversial receipt The Supreme Court refused to grant leave to appeal the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Akhora Khattak lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.