Find a Lawyer

NON-TRANSPARENT PROCEDURE OF PURCHASE OF 150 LOCOMOTIVES BY MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS RESULTANTLY CAUSING versus

Article 184 (3) by MotoCase Pakistan Railway procurement of 150 DE engines by a foreign company without the invitation of tenders from other international companies at the very low rates, the Secretary Railway has the court The Supreme Court has stated that it has canceled the immovable order. Will issue fresh tenders through purchase and international competitive bidding in which to transparently invite all international manufacturers of locomotives as defined by Pakistan Railways. The Supreme Court dealt with the observation that after the preparation of fresh tenders, any body feels dissatisfied with the details of the locomotives. The need to supply can make the appropriate procurement before the authorized forum

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• Mst. SARWAR JAN v. MUKHTAR AHMAD 2012 PLD 217
• STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor v. IMTIAZ ALI KHAN 2012 PLC(CS) 218
• QAMAR alias MITHO v. State 2012 PLD 222
• FIAQAT HUSSAIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Planning and Development Division, Islamabad 2012 PLD 224
• Mst. INAYATAN KHATOON v. MUHAMMAD RAMZAN 2012 SCMR 229
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 6 OF 2010 v. (SUO MOTU ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF PRESCRIBED MINIMUM WAGES TO THE SECURITY GUARDS WORKING IN PTC 2012 PLC 232
• MUHAMMAD NAZEEF KHAN v. GULBAT KHAN 2012 SCMR 235
• MUHAMMAD MUSA v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2012 PLC 240

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Bisham lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes