For the specific performance of the contract to sell to the Power of Attorney Authority, in conjunction with the Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), the suit plaintiff sought on that occasion the specific performance of the contract to sell. After the receipt of the money, the defendant hanged the hanging of attorney The defendant resisted the lawsuit in favor of the fact that the money received from the plaintiff was a debt and was not equal to the payment of the sale. The lower appellate court rejected the same High Court in its review jurisdiction. The judgment and decree relating to the trial were restored and the lower appellate court justified. Detecting the accuracy of the High Court was correct and hence the amount received could not be given a loan color when the presentation of the evidence on record did not support it. The lawyer and the sale agreement, which was implemented through the above board's evidence, left no defense for the ant to stand up and deny his execution along with his chin, as the sale was considered. The Power of Attorney was hanged upon receipt, the agency's articles were linked to the agent's interest in it, and the purpose behind the creation of the agency was to protect and protect it. Defendant's interest on the defendant's payment to defendant refuses to agree that no transfer can be made through a power of attorney without his donor's consent, a matter of current authority. In which interest falls under the scope of 202. Decision of the Treaty Act, 1872 and of the High Court
