Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD WASEEM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Assassination Bail, Joint Extra-Court Admission of Confirmation Completion of the challan Further investigation The defendant's confession was that the only evidence against it was the evidence of the combined extra-judicial confession and witnesses. ? Additional judicial confession on the accuracy of Wajitkar was allegedly a crime and joint confession by the accused and his accomplice, which was untrue in the evidence and proceeded to involve the accused with remarkable delay to Wajitkar's testimony. , The investigation had already been finalized and the invoice was presented, thus bail was not allowed for the physical custody of the accused for investigative purposes.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIYT v. KAMAL FOOD (PVT.) LTD. OKARA 2012 PLD 371
• Dr. Syed SIBTAIN RAZA NAQVI v. HYDROCARBON DEVELOPMENT 2012 SCMR 377
• AMEER ZEB v. State 2012 PLD 380
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. Mst. AZRA PARVEEN 2012 SCMR 380
• Mst. ROHAIFA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence 2012 SCMR 388
• PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LIMITED v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX 2012 SCMR 392
• Suo Motu action regarding VIOLATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT RULES, 2004 2012 PLC(CS) 394
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2012 SCMR 395

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes