Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, R2 Toulouse Plaintiff, had previously been dismissed by the trial court for the necessary details filed by the umpire, but it was submitted by the Lower Appellate Court and the High Court that the vendor Had failed it. It was fatal for the importer to mention the time and place of the ponds in the property before the witnesses mentioned only the dates and not the time and place of making the determination of the time and place demanded by immediate demand (s) and notice. It was necessary to mention the details which were also required to prove that, in order to know when and where the Emperor received the information in the premature manner and how he responded to it, if the notice was urgently sought. And the details of the date, time and place of the claim are the details of the evidence. And the same was not to be mentioned in the case, then the plaintiff could not defend the decision because such statements were not mentioned in the evidence in the trial court before the details of the foregoing by the prosecution itself. There was a need to make a statement in court where the pre-emptor chooses not to appear as his own witness with no disability, so such statements should be stated by his lawyer in his evidence. ? The pre-emptor's lawyer did not mention any such details, although the pre-emptor's attorney stated that he received information about the sale on 16 11 1993, but when and where he told his brother and what. The time was not mentioned, the required requirements according to the requirements of the law (TOLB) with such evidence, recent transfer
