Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) sought to evict tenant landlords (applicants), demolish the building and evict the tenant (respondents) on the basis of reconstruction and the need for personal stability of landlords. The rental application was rejected by the rental controller. , The Appellate Court and the High Court on the ground that it was not a good thing to sue and demolish the building. The permission period for the reconstruction by the competent authority had expired and was not renewed by the landlords, and this request for personal necessity could not be considered precisely because two of the houses were relocated abroad. Yes, the landlord's emphasis was clearly on the basis of deviation. The building and its renovation, which includes the area of two shops in the tenant's possession, and in support of their application, they had also developed the required permissions for the construction and construction projects, which were authorized by the competent authority. Approved in order to support a personal claim. The good thing is, a landlord appeared in the witness box in his personal possession of the city and in vague words about his personal illicit need, and such statement on the affidavit was filed against the claims in the eviction request. And remained unprotected. The shutter in cross-examination shows the fact that two other shops were empty in the building, which God did not let out, should be taken as a positive factor in favor of the landlords for a long time to prove their good fortune. But, unfortunately for the landlords, it is one to conclude
