Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), MANDI BAHAUDDIN

Section 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Promotion Order, was charged by the Department with regard to the recall of such order that it dismissed the fraudulent appeal by the service tribunal on the basis of the inquiry report. The appellant had failed to establish his progress. The order has been approved by the Promotion Committee for Appellant that such an inquiry is not legal because the members of the publicity committee considered the working paper for promotion of the appellant, which was not examined during the inquiry, The inquiry report did not explicitly state whether the members of the publicity committee were to be examined by the inquiry officer or not, and the Supreme Court put aside the controversial decision and directed the secretary of the department to Create an Inquiry Committee as per the Law Officer statement and schedule the conclusion of the inquiry in a timely manner. Make sure of.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL INVESTIGATION, LAHORE v. ASGHAR ALI 2012 PLC(CS) 787
• DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD v. Mehr ASIF NADEEM 2012 PLC(CS) 793
• ABDUL RAHMAN QURESHI v. AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN 2012 PLC(CS) 805
• Rana MUHAMMAD KHALIL v. REGIONAL AUDIT CHIEF 2012 PLC(CS) 816
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION 2012 PLC(CS) 834
• ABDUL GHAFOOR SHEIKH v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2012 PLC(CS) 848
• ASJAD HUSSAIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER (ADMINISTRATION) POWER, WAPDA 2012 PLC(CS) 853
• MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN v. RASHID SHAFIQUE 2012 SCMR 854

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

famous lower court advocate from Madinah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes