Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF SINDH versus SYED AFTAB ALI SHAH

Article 212 (3) The Civil Service Promotion Hardship Case Service Tribunal restored an earlier order in favor of a civil servant (defendant), who at one time (the labor case) with the observation ordered that he be detained from view Should not be presented. Other officers of the Branch Supreme Court granted leave to appeal the tribunal's order to examine the legality and ownership of such order as well as the order to restore the order.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN v. RASHID SHAFIQUE 2012 SCMR 854
• AJMAL HASSAN KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2012 SCMR 860
• TABASSUM SHAHZAD v. I.S.I. 2012 PLC(CS) 866
• ADNAN A. KHAWAJA v. THE STATE 2012 PLD 866
• REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE v. RIZWAN AHMED KHAN 2012 SCMR 870
• BAZ MUHAMMAD KAKAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2012 PLD 870
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, PESHAWAR v. SHAHZAD GHEE MILLS (PVT.) LTD. 2012 SCMR 880
• Syed TAHIR ABBAS SHAH v. OGDCL through M.D. Head Office, Islamabad 2012 PLC(CS) 885

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

online advocate from Dadakhel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes