Section 4 (1) (b) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 9 (1) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 Promotion, promotion Eligibility for Development and fitness Fitness Fitness Commitment to civil fitness determination and scope and scope. The Central Selection Board Scope by a Government Employer (Appellant) was that he had a great career and his PER showed the authenticity of being out of the board. Notwithstanding that he was sacked on the basis of his electoral ability and competence, his integrity and performance were not observed against anything by serious selection and the Central Performance Board, and it was That some of the public servants who were promoted had negative entries. Along with the PERs, their pro forma promotion developed by the Central Selection Board \ and \ fitness \ had two distinct criteria, mainly for the terms and conditions of service and their applicability to relevant government employees, However, fitness was a subjective assessment based on objective criteria and therefore did not qualify as section 4 (1) (b) of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, especially against the order or decision of a department's authority. The right to appeal to the tribunal was withheld. In the matter of fitness or the appointment of another person or holding a particular position or being promoted to a higher level, for the development of fitness of a public servant, etc., the authorities concerned had to be used in a fair, open and fair manner. The performance of a public servant should be based on evaluation and such practice should not be arbitrary or viable. Either way, when it comes to the question of fitness, someone
