ABDUL RAZZAK versus SHABNAM NOONARI
Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) The Family Court decided the suit filed by the wife (respondent) for the maintenance of restitution allowance and maintenance of the dowry articles and restoration of the Dover amount. The wife was entitled to the past and to take care of the future at the rate of Rs 3000 per month with a 5% increase every year till the legal privilege, while every minor daughter up to her marriage increased by 5% every year to Rs 2,000 per month. The husband (applicant) filed an appeal and a constitutional petition against the order before the first appellate court and the High Court, respectively. , But both were dismissed. Husband's argument was that the courts below had no limited source of financial status and income for the husband, not enough to provide for the monthly care provided by the Family Court. ۔ After their participation and proper appreciation of the evidence before the Family Court, a declaration was made for restoration, etc., and for this reason the High Court intervened under Article 199 of the Constitution using its equitable and arbitrary jurisdiction. Denied. In this case, the Supreme Court rejected the leave application for appeal, in the circumstances
immigration advocates contact from Quaidabad lawyer
