Sections 497 (2) (5) and 173 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) request for the cancellation of bail, on the basis of fresh supplementary challan against the accused and the co-accused (bank officials) thereafter, to file a bail application. emitted. That they approved auto loans in fake names and then loan money out of pocket the High Court approved the accused's bail, and the co-accused complainant (applicant) was punished by the High Court for the accused and the co-accused. Bar bail pleas were dismissed, however, for the third time the bail was granted on the ground of disagreement of the preceding views set by the High Court, the litigation was not named in the FIR nor was their name The first invoice presented by the investigating agency came as a suspect in the investigation, which itself The reason for this was because when the matter for further investigation came up, the sub-invoice was permissible to repeat the request for bail because of the latest requests, as more material is collected in the sub-invoice, which allows the court to form a different opinion than before. The Investigating Officer constituted admitted that he could not collect direct evidence against the accused or the accompanying accused to prove that they were. After scrutinizing the contents of the loan payments, the High Court granted bail in its discretion and the Supreme Court would not interfere with such order unless it was shown that Serious injustice has been done and the matter of further investigation has come to light and the High Court was able to grant bail.
