Para 2 01 01 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 The dispute regarding the allotment of accommodation between Pakistan International Airlines and its hosts has been decided by the High Court's jurisdiction to decide the appellants in its constitutional jurisdiction, which is the International The airlines (the defendants) were allotted airports. Room / accommodation for air hostesses at the airline's trainer hostel, but later a letter was issued asking them to evacuate the hostel to a vacancy that was not just training for the airline's permanent staff. Was for the winners. According to Paragraph 2 01 01 of the Personal Policies Manual, the hostel was entitled to stay and consequently a constitutional petition was filed before the High Court, but the court refused to interfere in its constitutional jurisdiction. Therefore, whenever a problem arises as a voila, they formulate its rules and then the terms and conditions of its employees will not be open by the High Court to interfere with its constitutional jurisdiction as it deals with Pakistan International Airlines. The relationship of his employees was that of the master and the servant and the facts of the present case were identified. There was indeed a dispute between the appellants and the Pakistan International Airline that the terms and conditions of service in which the "Master and Servant" rule would be fully applied and consequently the High Court was correct in interfering with its constitutional jurisdiction. Denied. Reject it accordingly. r \ n \ r \ n
