Sections 7 (1) and 2 (i) (B) of the Punjab Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R8 inter-seniority appellant (civil servants) and defendants (public servants) temporarily in BS 17 Was set. In the letters respondents were appointed on development projects that were foreign-funded and after the closure of the project, they were adjusted against permanent positions based on the length of their services under temporary plans, where Respondents were placed senior in the Appeals Seniority List Appellants' destiny was that the respondents were working on temporary "development" projects and their salaries were provided with foreign monitoring assistance, therefore, they were sent to Punjab. In view of Section 2 (i) (b) of civil servants, there were no civil servants. The Act, 1974; this person is appointed on a project post on a yearly basis, seniority cannot be granted for permanent visas appointments against permanent positions or against \ nondevelopment \ positions. The Service Tribunal was wrong in knowing that merely changing posts from \ development to \ non-development posts, did not change the appointments, terms and conditions of service or the nature of the seniority of the operational unit / cadre and parties. I, and the delay in challenging seniority litigation cannot be grounds for not appealing the appellants as the termination of seniority is a violation of the law and is a frequent cause and can be challenged at any time. Appellants concluded that because the respondents were appointed against certain schemes, they were dismissed and adjusted against specific positions after the removal of earlier posts.
