MUHAMMAD SAFDAR versus PUNJAB LAND COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY
Section 6 Land Reforms Act (III of 1977), Section 6 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 70 and 89 Ordinance During its introduction and passing in Parliament, the Land Reform Ordinance, 1977 Scope Gift Deed, Claims in the Land Certificate Question / Appellants were gifted by their predecessor through interest / announcer, the day before the implementation of the Land Reform Act, 1977, the Land Commissioner did not accept the said gift, however, because The land is part of the Commonwealth, therefore, the division of the Lease, the announcer is given a choice as to which part he would like to retain and which part he will surrender, The claimants submitted after the decision Qazalbash dedicated Zealand v Chief Land Commissioner, Punjab, and the case filed a writ petition before the High Court. Others (PLD 1990 SC 99), under which certain provisions of the Land Reforms Act 1977 were declared against the integration of Islam. The petition was dismissed by the High Court as well as the claimant's assertion that the gift proceedings were made in his favor a day before the implementation of the Land Reforms Act, 1977, therefore, section 6 of the Act Was not attracted to. The Land Commissioner specifically stated that the holding of the proclamation is joint, therefore, the land should be divided and the announcers have the power to retain and hand over the country, only if they surrender. The land could have been occupied, but it was not done. In view of Article 89 of the Constitution in the present day, the Land Reform Ordinance 1977 was a legitimate legislation with a life of one hundred and twenty days, during which a period of one hundred and twenty days.
