HAFIZ MUHAMMAD SHARAF-UD-DIN versus DISTRICT JUDGE, KHUSHAB
Section 5, Schedule and 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reinstatement Laches, Failure to Submit Decision-Making Allowance by the Father of the Minor The Appeal Court Demands the Father's Rehabilitation Allowance for a Minor Son The submission was directed but he failed and the appeal was dismissed for non-submission of honorarium. The Appeal Court amended Family Court decision directing the father to submit a minor restitution allowance and failing to comply was ordered by the father demanding strict action against him on this basis. It was denied that the plaintiff's father had failed to submit to the care of the minor, as directed by the court, the submission of the juvenile rehabilitation allowance was not a prerequisite to the provision of the law. The plaintiff in the interim rehabilitation was legal to be the real father of the minor, morally and ethically obliged to uphold it in accordance with the orders of Islam, the restitution allowance set by the Family Court for the minor's son's education, clothing, medicine, as well as others. Even ordinary expenses cannot be considered extraordinary. The Family Court rulings and decrees were rightly revised in which the Court of Appeal rightly rejected the plaintiff's restitution allowance. The impeachment order was neither illegal nor invalid appellate court decisions. The invalid judgments and injunctions determined by the medium have been identified and the orders passed by the courts below were in accordance with the law and the facts of the case were subjected to the constitutional petition and were not upheld in the Constitution.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
