Sections 6 and 14 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the right to self-determination before the right of clause 42, the former emperor as a participant in a survey number, and this can be held safely. That the plaintiffs were partners. The farm / co-participant, who was a participant in a survey number in a field, will be considered a co-participant in all survey numbers containing the plaintiffs, in which case, all three courts have the right to lose ownership before the trial. That is, the Appellate Court and the High Court below did not omit the important point. And recorded the findings that since the plaintiffs were not co-plaintiffs in the dispute in which the land was settled, they failed to establish a pre-purchase right, which was not correct, by the imposed judgment and the three courts listed below. The orders were set aside and held. In the circumstances, the suit was pronounced by the Supreme Court that the defendants had successfully established their right to purchase in advance.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
