Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Qatil Adham, Investigating the evidence in a joint intention appeal against acquittal, the prosecutor involved the situation and the complainant made several statements to the police. Did not provide a conflicting statement about. About 14 months after the chain of circumstantial evidence was signed, the complaint was signed by the Department HO about the complainant, deliberately seeking correctional status, as advised. And it had to work all the time to create a story of reassurance that had completely changed. The color of the story During this time, the complainant, where dissatisfaction with the top authorities about the initial investigation of the police case, was a matter of improvement, resulting in the nature of the preliminary version being changed. Was. At the beginning of the complaint before the trial court prosecution, there was no attempt to establish an MO in the case. The employer had no evidence available to substantiate the content of the alleged extra-judicial confession of the element of criminal conviction, There was no benefit to the prosecution, which was otherwise a weak type of evidence when in the absence of direct evidence, there were doubts. The decision to have multiple material points bad, in the circumstances, cannot be interfered with
