SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus DATA STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI
Section 47A (4) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the Offshore XVII) Office, Article 2 (3) (ii) the resolution of alternative disputes proposed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman against the members of the Dispute Resolution Committee. The disciplinary proceedings could not be initiated against the members of the committee and after thorough consideration of the matter, the committee could first decide that the order of validity was approved on 27 in 2007 and an alternative dispute resolution committee was formed. In the report dated 18 11 2008, the Committee was given to the Federal Board of Revenue on 30 9 2009, ie after 323 days instead of the fixed 90 days, the Federal Board of Revenue was required to dissolve the Committee in presenting its report. Failure to dissolve the committee because of failure, even if it failed. After receiving the report, the Federal Board of Revenue needed to reorganize a new committee within 15 days instead of 90 days. It was delayed for more than three years while the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee still had to submit its latest recommendations, meanwhile the Appellate Tribunal decided the matter, cited separately but The complainant may be satisfied at this point, but the negligence, delay, disqualification, ineligibility and inattentiveness of the tax authorities on several levels of the taxpayer is disclosed when the taxpayer is facilitated. The design method has been changed from inch to inch by inch to look at corruption decisions at all levels. May be called for secondary, who are responsible for providing due process, prompt disposal of taxpayers and relief
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2013
