Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DATA STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD


Section 47A (4) Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) (ii) Alternative Dispute Resolution The Federal Board of Revenue stated that the Committee had established within its 90-day allotment Did not submit recommendations. Under Section 47A (3) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, a new alternative dispute resolution committee is in the process of the Constitution and any complaint in this regard will be communicated to the complainant at the appropriate time. Within 90 days, the recommendations of the Federal Board of Revenue within the 90 days of the Federal Board of Revenue asked the same committee to consider some matters that the committee submitted its latest recommendations on 16th 2011, ie the second reference board. Substantial demands should be made for subsequent disciplinary action. The members of the committee, especially the members of the department, but there was nothing in the record to show that the Federal Board of Rio Avenue took the necessary steps to resolve the issue, nor that the Federal Board of Revenue made the committee members. Has taken action against submitting a report containing recommendations which, according to the Commissioner, were not based on facts and were against the law. The Federal Board of Revenue failed to pass appropriate orders within 45 days of receipt of the final recommendation, instead, after more than 11 months of filing, the Federal Board of Revenue received a letter from the Chief Commissioner through a 7 for 2012 letter. Report requested. The Federal Board of Revenue expressly violated the provisions of Section 47A (4) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, by not approving orders within the required 45-day period of receipt of the recommendations, which passed unanimous recommendations on 16 passing 2011. Order approval was delayed. A committee was set up that was tantamount to mismanagement by the Federal Tax Ombudsman

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Bannu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.