LOTTE PAKISTAN (PTA) LTD. versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 2 (14), 7 (1) and Section 10 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) The claimant refunded the amount under section 10 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 Filed a retraction claim that fully supported the copying. In relation to the Department of Sales Tax Advance Tax, the invoice for the claimed payment invoices, with no justification by the Federal Board of Revenue, has been postponed, as assessed with the Sindh Revenue. ? The board, which caused a great delay, negligence, negligence, incompetence and inability to pay duties and responsibilities from the Federal Board of Revenue, which is a systemic issue needs to be addressed on a priority basis. The Board of Revenue will devise a procedure for compiling taxpayers' sales tax adjustment claims, which is equivalent to corruption in terms of section 2 (3) of the STAB. The Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, approved the approval of the Federal Board of Revenue, to provide a database link in accordance with the mutual agreement between the Sindh Revenue Board and the Federal Board of Revenue to resolve the systemic issue. Instruct the Chief Commissioner to process and resolve the complainant's claims, report compliance with the law and within 30 days \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2013
