Find a Lawyer

IMPEX AGENCIES, KARACHI versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The scope of the complaint against Section 9 National Tariff Commission Act, 1990 (VI 1990), Section 4 Federal Tax Ombudsman, against the enforcement of anti-dumping and counter-responsibilities by the National Tariff Commission is the scope of such complaint. Was unable to maintain the car. The National Tariff Commission came under the jurisdiction of the Commerce Ministry, and it was not operating under the Revenue Division, and the jurisdiction over such matters was apparent to the Federal Ombudsman.

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2013

• BASHIR PRINTING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 534
• DATA STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 929
• SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD v. DATA STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI 2013 PTD 933
• WAHEED SHAHZAD BUTT, TAX RESOLUTION SERVICES COMPANY, LAHORE v. CHAIRMAN, F.B.R., 2013 PTD 1293
• QUAID-E-AZAM MEDICAL COLLEGE, BAHAWALPUR v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1393
• LOTTE PAKISTAN (PTA) LTD. v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1545
• EAGLE ENGINEERING WORKS v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1702
• SECCO PAK (PVT.) LTD. v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1770

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes