Find a Lawyer

KH. ABDUL HAMID versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Section 13 and 22 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the appointment of a retired public servant under the section 44 written application agreement, generally with no restrictions on the standards provided under the relevant rules or The options used by the public worker should be supported. In strict compliance with the laws of the land, the overriding travel of the rules has damaged the structure of the bureaucracy, causing irritation among government employees who would otherwise be eligible for development but discretionary options. It was deprived of, or in the case of, political interference or housing of highly influential people who retired after the age of power and the rule of law and constitution by rulers and rulers for good governance. Has strict and fidelity restrictions, otherwise, its non-restrictive rules N Even with government agencies bring bad name

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• MUHAMMAD WAQAS v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 1165
• Syed SIBTUL HASSAN GILLANI v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 MLD 1191
• MUHAMMAD SADHEER v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 1205
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. KALA KHAN 2013 CLC 1246
• KHALID MAHMOOD v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1286
• Sardar RAZA MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN 2013 CLC 1345
• Mir AQEEL-UL-ISLAM v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION BOARD, MIRPUR 2013 CLC 1355
• COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEM 2013 CLD 1438

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Chak Jhumra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes