MUHAMMAD SADHEER versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Sections 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act (XXII of 1975), retaining the Section 4 writ petition challenged the appointment of a less qualified candidate for not selecting a civil service candidate. The petitioner took the first position in the examination. And the interviewer decided on a re-evaluation of the papers. The cancellation of the lesser qualified appointment and the re-advertisement of the post and the applicant's respondents, who were re-examined by the Service Tribunal, became a public servant after his appointment as the applicant had to consult the service tribunal. Was responsible for Writ Petition was not Stable To follow the Constitution's command, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal was set up to resolve disputes related to the terms and conditions of the employees who were or were in the service of Azad Jammu. And only one civil servant, irrespective of any government order in the Kashmir MMO and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act, 1975, including disciplinary matters under section 4 of Azad Kashmir, any department in respect of any terms and conditions. Was made by the authority, the service tribunal could file an appeal before accepting the petitioner. Not a civil servant and only challenged the merit list prepared by the Selection Committee and the re-advertisement order of the post, before which the Service Tribunal was unable to give any direction in the present matter and thereafter it was not challenged. What could have been done, the written request was intact. And under this the department was directed to appoint the applicant
