MUHAMMAD WAQAS versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Article 44 Right Petition The Civil Service Chief Officer Municipal Committee (BS 17), was appointed by the Authority on the appointment of the officer without completing the selection process, the order of the High Court was approved in the petitioners' previous writ petition. Which will direct the authority to test. And interview within 60 days and allow it to continue on an ad hoc basis. Failure of the Authority, the applicant's failure to comply with such earlier directives of the High Court was again announced by the Selection Committee effect petition of the applicant after the approval of the previous High Court order two years later. After more than two years of successful tests and interviews, the High Court did not apply for the preliminary injunction, but instead continued its ad hoc appointment against the Commissioner Court Petitioner, unconditionally and after his participation. Had chosen. In such an election process, the protest would be deemed to waive its rights. On the basis of such directives of the High Court applicant, the holding of respect for the election was not likely to be referred to the High Court with clear hands. Therefore, he was not entitled to arbitrary relief, as the circumstances led to the High Court dismissing the writ petition.
