Find a Lawyer

MIR AQEEL-UL-ISLAM versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION BOARD, MIRPUR

The Writing Section failed to issue a Written Request for Matriculation Examination by the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education as a successful candidate, the Board's Intermediate and Secondary Education Controller issued a script and re-entered the article. Had returned his admission form to. 471 marks passed the controller of such test while the High Court demanded that the applicant be acknowledged the facts for returning such admission form. This type of controller's interior will be bound to the board and they cannot be allowed to blow hot and cold in the same breath. It is requested that the applicant was mistakenly sanctioned and he was not entitled to the result card. Unlawfully or without legal authority, no authority could suffer due to the order of the authority, if the board applied to the applicant. Had he not returned his admission form, he would have passed this way. Three years before equity, the board will be required to issue necessary instructions in the examination. The High Court directed the applicant to immediately issue his result card to the petitioner. Approved by

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. KALA KHAN 2013 CLC 1246
• Kh. ABDUL HAMID v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1264
• KHALID MAHMOOD v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1286
• Sardar RAZA MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN 2013 CLC 1345
• COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEM 2013 CLD 1438
• BABAR JAMIL v. CONSERVATOR FOREST, MUZAFFARABAD CIRCLE 2013 PLC(CS) 1482
• ARSHAD MEHMOOD v. BARKAT ALI 2013 PCrLJ 1530
• State v. DILDAR HUSSAIN 2013 PCrLJ 1552

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

property advocates from Daud Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes