TALHA SARFRAZ versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Admission in candidates for MBBS and BDS courses and House Job Regulations, Regulation 9 terms, Regulations 4 and 9 Independent Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 Writ Petition Medical College The committee approved. However, the applicant was also denied on the basis that he could not obtain a merit position against the quota of Overseas Kashmiris. The applicant had prayed that the candidates should be declared admissible by declaring the offending, mola and instructional violation of the authorities for admission against the category under the title of students abroad, Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Regulations. Made without valid authorization under 2010, the only condition was that a student should pass the equivalent of Pakistan's Intermediate Level Examination from the foreign education system. The only prerequisite was that they were Pakistan Nationals, and had passed their exams before securing seats for Overseas Kashmiri children while studying abroad with the foreign education system. Overseas Kashmiri children enrolled against the seats. All students / respondents, except one, were not in dual occupation The nationality residential work permit issued in favor of the defendant's parents, was not a substitute for dual citizenship, as it was issued for a limited period and for any purpose Will remain valid for a certain period of time. In the category of overseas Kashmiri children, they were required to send their applications with passports, visas and equality certificates, which was irrational for admission, which could not be relaxed, where admissions were subject to policy and legal. ?????
