Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASIF KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

CH II, R 29 (4) & (5) [as incorporated by notification of AJK Government through notification 9, 2010 2010] included in the Police Act (V 1868), section 46 subsection (4) and (5). In addition to the Police Rules, 1934, the police validity government had broad powers to enforce the rules under section 46 of the Police Act 1861. Such further provisions were not contrary to the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974 or its original Act, 1861. Neither harsh nor illicit

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• IQRA EJAZ v. MOHI-UD-DIN ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, NERIYAN SHARIF 2013 MLD 461
• SAJIDA MAQSOOD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR DISTRICT MUZAFFARABAD 2013 MLD 520
• TALHA SARFRAZ v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 YLR 652
• MUHAMMAD FAAZAL HASHMI v. FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 668
• SHERIJ KHAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 CLC 684
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. Kh. ALI MUHAMMAD 2013 MLD 685
• ASIM MAHMOOD v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2013 PLC(CS) 701
• WAJID ABBASI v. TAHIRA JAMIL 2013 MLD 755

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

female advocates from Mailsi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes