MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, ISLAMABAD
Article 22A, 22B and 154 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 FIR registration of constitutional petition Civil and criminal proceedings The applicant thwarted the order of justice, under which false documents of their own land were signed. An FIR registration petition against the defendants for making was dismissed. On the basis that this case is linked to civil litigation and the civil court will proceed with better litigation. The legal status of a civil suit does not prohibit the registration of a criminal case against my instability. If a recognizable offense is committed, the station house officer disclosed that he has clearly stated that his modification Thumb impressions and signatures were fake and in this regard there are contradictions between the lighter patches and the variable found in the Department of Revenue records. The respondents had committed an adversarial crime: and the applicant was deprived of the allegation of a valuable right inflicted by the applicant, which required the order of a full inquiry into the justice of the said order. That with the full jurisdiction the adjudicating civil court shall proceed with a punishable action in a better way. He had the right to be charged under section 154, CCPC, and he could not be asked to wait for a civil court action. The High Court, rejecting the unclean order of Justice of Peace, directed Section H to file an FIR against constitutional respondents. Accordingly the application was allowed
