Find a Lawyer

ASAD ALI versus STATE

Section 9 (c) definition of evidence from the possession and transport of drug addicts, sentenced to less than five gram samples were sent to the accused for chemical analysis at the conclusion of the trial. The death sentence was sent for each packet / piece not separately collected for chemical analysis purposes, so the samples sent could not be called representative samples and it did not even come in high enough praise for just this quantity. I needed marijuana, the final evidence of which was available through a chemical report. Should be (Customs official) was also unclear in terms of quantity This four-wheeled vehicle was not owned by the accused as the death sentence by the trial court was extremely severe, the circumstances had already been converted into prison. Had dismissed the appeal accordingly.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• SAFEER HUSSAIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Secretary of Establishment Division 2013 PLC(CS) 28
• HASSAN RAZA SYED v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (WEST), ISLAMABAD 2013 PLD 31
• Dr. VIKTOR HACKER v. Dr. SHAHIDA MANSOOR 2013 PLD 34
• BADSHAH JAN v. ALLAH DITTA SETHI 2013 PLD 39
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL v. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED (OGDCL) 2013 PLC(CS) 43
• MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2013 MLD 45
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLD 45
• SABA ALTAF v. State 2013 PCrLJ 48

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes