Section 498 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 344/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997) Section 6 (1) (b), 6 (2) (b), (g), (i), (i), (m) ) & Wrongful imprisonment for ten or more days, joint intentions, arrest warrant prior to terrorist acts, cancellation of imprisonment of judges of high courts against former president Pakistan and Chief of Army Staff He was suspended. Judges of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and 60 other High Courts barred him from his position and kept him under house arrest for a period of five and a half months, for which he was unable to perform his judicial duties. But it was advised that the police did not enter that part of the relevant law that was supposed to prevent the FIR convincing judges of the affair courts from performing their duties, which was an act of terrorism that was enacted under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Was attracted to the present case. The police were unlawful to enter those sections of the relevant law in which the contents of the FIR were advised. According to the investigating officer, the accused did not join the investigation, but a telephonic message was sent to the court that The content to be provided was the defendant's refusal to make such a move. Misuse of a concession in a court order and bail alleges that the police or the complainant failed to identify any misconduct by the offender, the alleged offense under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), c. The CP accused was also a culprit and thus could not be claimed. The accused was usually designated specially in the FIR and was also required for further investigation.
